With the ability to understand comes the ability to misunderstand. That is why we must tune in with out nature rather than being born this way. If it were automatic, would it be beautiful, and/or appreciated?
9.26.12
With the ability to understand comes the ability to misunderstand. That is why we must tune in with out nature rather than being born this way. If it were automatic, would it be beautiful, and/or appreciated?
9.26.12
One who opposes nature in certain cases simply doesn’t understand the higher order; the ultimate harmony.
9.18.12
We cannot make a metaphor to what we create, as this is circular logic (proving the ideal with an instance of it as proof). Instead, we must only do so with nature, as this is “true” and natural.
8.2.12
Because we force our ideals onto the world, we work harder. Like cutting grass, the earth knows no limits (at least to us) so we impose them continuously. If we accepted the world as it is, it seems we’d be free of much labor. This modern world, though, is sadly built on “production” ideology and trivial, unnecessary work.
7.30.12
When we fall in love with a person, we are really just falling in love with the Universe/Nature. So if it’s merely circumstances that build a person, are there also other things besides a person (like a tree, a rock.. etc) that reflects these same circumstances? Are they, in some way, your “signature” tree, or you as a tree, so to speak?
7.28.12
Love itself isn’t “good” but we call it “good” because it allows the natural harmony to flow between people through cooperation, selflessness, sacrifice and the like rather than hate which is “bad” because it doesn’t allow harmony- it’s unnatural.
1.24.12
What happens when we watch too much TV? What about 3D TV? If our eyes adjust to the circumstances (TV) over time, then what happens when we attempt to look elsewhere; at the true world again?
1.21.12
There is only necessary and unnecessary-all has it’s place, just as every adaptation is fit for some environment.
1.13.12